Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tricky (TV series)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Pop (British and Irish TV channel). Editors were unable to find reliable sources for the subject, but identified Pop (British and Irish TV channel) as a viable redirect target. — Newslinger talk 22:06, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Tricky (TV series)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Tricky (TV series) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has been unsourced for a long time. The show doesn't appear to be very notable, and has very little coverage, which is mostly in YouTube videos and iMDB. Perhaps since the mascot was brought back for Pop for a few years, perhaps the article could redirect to there instead of being deleted? What are you guy's thoughts? Foxnpichu (talk) 10:27, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 10:37, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 10:37, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 10:37, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 December 20. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:45, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
• Redirect, no sources (if the external are supposed to be sources, then they are blatantly unreliable) but since they reused the mascot, this should redirect to another article that mentions him (perhaps Pop as the nominator suggested) and merge applicable information there. Otherwise delete as a second option. James-the-Charizard (talk to me!) (contribs) 19:48, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

• @James-the-Charizard - I totally agree with what you have to say. If we do redirect the article to Pop, should we add a few sentences mentioning Tricky/Rory's past? He is currently not mentioned at all on the Pop article, as he was previously, but the info was removed due to being original research. Foxnpichu (talk) 22:46, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

• Foxnpichu, We should if it happens, but also try starting a discussion on the talk page if it gets removed again. James-the-Charizard (talk to me!) (contribs) 22:54, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

• @James-the-Charizard - Sounds like a plan! Foxnpichu (talk) 22:58, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.